This model assumes a human as a driver, and inducing the operation of the vehicle. But in an automated vehicle world, where decisions are delegated to software, sensors, and machine learning, who or what is the ‘driver’? How do you prove liability if you cannot establish a wrongful act or omission of a driver? This model will particularly be lacking as driverless vehicles become commonplace. Fault becomes nebulous and the law, as it currently stands is not well suited to protect injured parties.
The NSW parliament passed the Transport Legislation Amendment (Automated Vehicle Trials and Innovation) Act 2017, allowing trial deployment of highly and fully automated vehicles (Levels 3–4), with the goal to gain a better understanding of automated vehicle technology’s capabilities and limitations.
A 2016 policy paper from SIRA concluded that legislative change will be required to deal with the issue of determination of fault.
If you’re in NSW, here’s what to keep in mind:
If automated vehicle technology fails—and causes injury or loss—the current models of insurance and liability will likely apply, but only with ambiguity.
Ultimately, responsibility could lead back to corporations behind automated vehicle technology, but litigation risk and precedent are nascent.
NSW residents and drivers should monitor legal changes into the future, to ensure that they are protected.
Keep up to date with the latest insights and news from Foye Legal