By
Emma Thomson & Taylor O'Connor
|
09/12/2025
A recent NSW Court of Appeal decision of Allianz Australia Insurance Limited v Bell [2025] NSWCA 187 has brought attention to how causation is determined in CTP claims.
Background of Case
In 2018, Mr John Bell was injured during an attempted theft of his Harley-Davidson motorcycle. The incident caused physical injuries to his leg and psychological injuries, namely Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) and Major Depressive Disorder. Mr Bell sought compensation under the Motor Accident Injuries Act 2017 (NSW).
The Legal Dispute
The case revolved around whether Mr Bell’s psychological injuries were caused by a “motor accident” as defined under the Act. Allianz Australia Insurance Limited argued that the psychological injuries stemmed from separate events, such as the theft and fear of retaliation, rather than the motor vehicle accident itself.
Court’s Decision
The NSW Court of Appeal upheld the Personal Injury Commission Medical Review Panel’s findings that:
Why This Matters
This case highlights the complexities of motor vehicle accident CTP claims, especially when psychological injuries are involved. It reinforces the importance of understanding how causation is determined.
Key Takeaways
This case is a reminder of the importance of seeking expert legal advice when navigating CTP claims. At Foye Legal, we are here to help you understand your rights and fight for the justice you deserve.
Read the full judgment here: Allianz Australia Insurance Limited v Bell
Keep up to date with the latest insights and news from Foye Legal